Tensions Flare at Inwood Rezoning Hearing

Inwood community board meeting

Public hearing attendee protests rezoning efforts in Manhattan’s Inwood community.

Emotions ran high Thursday night at a public hearing about proposed rezoning plans for Inwood, with elected officials and activists accusing each other of shutting down conversation and exploiting racial dynamics to push their agenda.

The meeting was a chance for residents to respond to a draft rezoning document released last month by Mayor Bill de Blasio’s administration that would spur thousands of new apartments near the northernmost tip of Manhattan. Hot-button issues include affordable housing provisions and the effect the proposal would have on the character of Inwood.

In addition to debating those details, the 70-plus residents and officials who spoke at Inwood’s Junior High School 52 addressed bubbling tensions in the community.

State Senator Marisol Alcantara accused constituents of using coded racial language in emails and on Facebook in discussions about rezoning, saying that some people have referred to the area’s several Dominican-born Democratic officials, of which she is one, as a “mafia” and “thugs” and told them to “go back to where they’re from.”

“They should be ashamed of themselves,” Alcantara said.

When a resident interrupted U.S. Representative Adriano Espaillat, whose district includes Inwood, to challenge Espaillat’s support for the reconstruction of Inwood Public Library as a combined library and affordable housing complex—an issue that has become central to the rezoning debate—Espaillat fired back.

U.S Representative Adriano Espaillat speaks to Inwood Community Board on Sept 14, 2017

U.S. Representative Adriano Espaillat addresses constituents at a public hearing on the proposed rezoning of Inwood at Inwood Junior High School 52 on Thursday, Sept. 14.

“My family was in this neighborhood,” he said, standing at a microphone facing the crowd. “My father got shot at, I got held up at gunpoint, we drove the drug dealers out of this neighborhood, we built schools. I have the right to be respected in this neighborhood.”

City Council Member Ydanis Rodriguez also scolded constituents, repeating a previous claim that the Save Inwood Library campaign had been “lying” by saying the library would remain closed during construction. Rodriguez has said a temporary library will be set up that period, though the details of such a plan have not been announced.

“I will not engage with those who seek to mislead and instill fear in this process,” said Rodriguez, who supports rezoning and took 60 percent of the vote in Tuesday’s Democratic primary. Josue Perez, a rezoning critic, challenged Rodriguez and won 31 percent of the vote.

Some residents expressed frustration Thursday with their elected officials’ focus on racial divides, saying that, while tensions may exist in the neighborhood, residents of all backgrounds should be informed about the potential hazards of rezoning.

Paloma Lara, a 29-year-old Washington Heights resident involved with the group Northern Manhattan is Not for Sale, said in Spanish that she felt Rodriguez was using the Latino community to drum up support for rezoning without offering details about the plan. “As a Dominican woman who cares about Dominican people and immigrants, it was very frustrating for me to see that,” Lara later said in an interview. “This [rezoning] is not going to help the people in this community.”

Seventy-five percent of Inwood residents are Hispanic or Latino, according to census figures.

Alcantara and Espaillat expressed reservations about the proposal in its current form, saying it falls short of meeting the community’s affordable housing needs. The rezoning scope document estimates that over 4,000 residential units could be created by 2032, of which around 1,500 units would be designated as affordable.

Alcantara said that’s not enough, adding that she sees no need for new housing in Inwood unless it is affordable: “I don’t think we need more luxury housing in this neighborhood.”

Twenty-eight percent of Inwood residents earn below $24,500 per year, according to census estimates, and about 70 percent of the housing stock under Community Board 12 is rent-regulated.

Even so, rents in the area increased by 38 percent from 2002 to 2014, according to the New York City Economic Development Corporation (EDC), and only 200 new units have been built in Inwood in the past two decades. EDC officials, who organized Thursday’s meeting, have indicated that increasing Inwood’s housing stock is ultimately necessary to ease the burden on renters.

More than 100 people attended a public hearing on the proposed rezoning of Inwood at Inwood Junior High School 52 on Thursday, Sept. 14.

Some residents agree, such as 28-year-old Peter Psathas, who commutes from Riverdale to work at Twin Donut on Broadway near 218th Street. Psathas said he would love to move to Inwood, adding that he has spoken to others in the community who are excited about the prospect of more housing, services, and businesses.

“A failure to up-zone and restricting housing supply would only increase rent,” Psathas said.

Still, many speakers Thursday said that the current rezoning plan is too extreme, with the possibility of new buildings as tall as 26 stories in a neighborhood that now has few structures taller than eight stories.

Some residents also argued that the city’s estimates for population increase—about 14,000 new residents in 15 years—are too conservative, and said that city services would be insufficient to support the increase.

The next step in the rezoning process is for the city to generate an environmental analysis, expected to be completed by the end of 2017. Then the rezoning proposal will be reviewed sequentially by Community Board 12, the Manhattan Borough President, the City Planning Commission, and the City Council.

Community Board 12 Chair Shah Ally said the board has not taken a stance on the proposal but has concerns about the prospect of high-rise buildings disrupting the character of the neighborhood.

More than three hours into the meeting, at around 9:30 p.m., Josue Perez, Rodriguez’s primary challenger, tried to strike a diplomatic tone. He thanked Rodriguez for staying so late to hear his constituents’ concerns. And he addressed the friction between Inwood’s elected officials and some of his own supporters.

“Let’s stop calling each other liars,” he said.

Residents who did not speak at Thursday’s meeting may submit comments on the draft document by Sept. 29, via email to ebrunner@cityhall.nyc.gov, or by mail to the Mayor’s Office of Environmental Coordination, Esther Brunner, Deputy Director, 253 Broadway, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10007.

 

Editors note: An earlier version of this story stated that the current rezoning plan may include new buildings as tall as 30 stories. The accurate height is as many as 26 stories. We regret the error. 

Share

2 Responses to "Tensions Flare at Inwood Rezoning Hearing"

  1. Schmogmoo Ikamunga  September 19, 2017 at 10:19 am

    Lol if there is an upzoning, then the Twin Donuts manager will have to find another job.

    The building he is referencing will be knocked down and built up. The owner has already floated ideas for a new building.

    Is Peter Psathasa relative of the owner who will make a windfall by selling to a developer???

    Peter Psathas, are you going to wait 10 years for a new luxury apartment? Or are you cocksure you are going to win the lottery for an affordable apartment because your comments are so genuinely supportive of the politicians and their vision?

    Wow, commuting from Riverdale is really tough. I am really glad you made the effort to come to the meeting. I really sympathize with your plight.

    I am sure the politicians are very pleased with your convincing input.

    Is it any wonder that that politicians play the race card here when they really want to pull a fast one on people of color?

    How come white neighborhoods don’t get upzoned for luxury housing with affordable units as chum/bait for suckers??

    Reply
  2. Inwood Resident  September 20, 2017 at 5:12 pm

    The politicans did their best to turn what should have been a technical hearing into an opportunity to thump their stump speeches. A pity they look so poorly on the constituents they supposedly serve, who waited hours to give their 3 minutes of testimony, long after most of the politicians had gone home.

    The city’s plan enables the creation, in theory, of 19,000 apartments, or 12,000 more than current theoretical maximums under current zoning. Through a series of assumptions and qualifications, they claim only 4,300 new apartments will be created, but even that is a full 10% of Inwood’s current population. No resident I have heard has said anything along the lines of NIMBY, but rather asked pointed questions about these assumptions and how their impact will be measured and mollified. Will the city blow off these questions, as they have almost all other input to date, and continue their one-way propaganda tour?

    The elected officials, hell-bent on building their legacy and obtaining votes for future offices, will be of little help here. It will be a real test of whether or not the ULURP system democratically serves city residents as it is supposed to.

    Of course, a less aggressive, rational rezoning (designed by urban planners and not economic development officials or politicians) would sail through. The city has brought this hard path upon themselves.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.